Since the murder of George Floyd by a White Minnesota police officer on 25th May 2020, business leaders from across the global responded swiftly with messages of condemnation as well as support for greater race equality, inside society at large, as well as commitments to corporate race inclusion strategies. But as time has moved on, how many organisations have moved from words of support to meaningful action, leading to lasting change?
Business that are truly committed to embedding race equality within their cultures and business decision-making frameworks do these 7 key things:
Before businesses can set a direction of travel, HR functions need to provide leaders with a business ‘heat map’. This heat map should be created by collecting, tracking and analysing data on the racial make-up of your workforce. A race inclusion ‘heat map’ is created by collecting, tracking and analysing data in key people decision-making including, recruitment, work allocation, time with leaders and performance reviews scores. Information should also be analysed based on role, function, pay and reward. This process provides organisations with potential hotspots of systematic race bias. By aggregating data across different ethnic groups businesses avoid a blanket labelling of ‘race’, and instead provide smart data covering a range of groups, such as Black British / African American, Asian British / Asian American and others. This process also includes conducting race pay audits.
Black men and women experience racism differently. Members of the Asian community also have common and yet different experiences of racial bias. Smart organisations use their data to apply an intersectional lens to race exclusion, examining in detail the cross-cutting themes of race, gender, social background, religion, age and other factors. This point is echoed by Fiona Daniels who stresses that “The glass ceiling effect goes hand in hand with systemic racism. This will be different in different countries too especially countries where you are not a minority”. In our work with clients, we take an intersectional approach when examining talent review processes to avoid over simplification that sometimes comes from a one dimensional view.
There is much confusion as to the nature of racial inequity in different countries. A common definition of racism – individual conscious intent – failures to recognise the true nature of racism within society as a whole and racism at work.
Ensure all key business stakeholders attend meaningful education programmes that focus on exploring;
While society at large must deal with prejudice in all its forms, we, at work, all have a part to play in the way that we can best influence. So, as business leaders of organisations, we need to ensure that we endeavour to be free from discrimination and use our platforms to influence others.
Many business have prioritised racial diversity at the expense of racial inclusion and belonging. The focus on representation, while good in intent, has, in many ways created cultures of division and separation. The current numbers-based strategy fails to promote psychological safety and cultures of belonging. Businesses should instead seek to raise the cultural competencies of leaders, HR colleagues and others.
To support race inclusive cultures businesses should;
Business leaders should use their financial muscle by driving race inclusion through their supply chain. Procurement teams should set explicit criteria for awarding new business contracts and in contract re-negotiations. Examples include;
Working under the principle of ‘what gets measured, gets done’, businesses should set public targets for promoting race inclusive workplaces. These targets should cover all areas across the employee life cycle, including recruitment, employee engagement, development opportunities and promotions. If in the UK, to meet these targets business should utilise the Positive Actions provisions within the Equality Act 2010. Other activities include implementing sponsorship programmes and creating a diverse leadership bench. Organisations will need to agree quick win targets as well as more longer-term strategic goals. Targets should be communicated both internally and externally, as public targets increase accountability and act as a motivator for sustainable and long-term action.
Businesses should establish long-term structures for measuring progress against any race inclusion strategy. Led by senior leaders, a race inclusion Action Group should be established. Representation should include stakeholders from a range of key business functions as well as black employees. Effective race inclusion action groups include a ‘devil’s advocate’ – an independent voice whose role is to provide expertise, advice and guidance, as well as scrutiny. Part of the Devil’s Advocate approach would include, for example, representation of ethnic minority colleagues in interview panels. Of course, organisations should avoid tokenism in this approach.